Extensive Reading as a Gateway to Create Research Gap: Valuable Lessons from Indonesian Expert Authors

  • Fahrus Zaman Fadhly Kuningan University
Keywords: extensive reading, extensive literature review, novelty, research gap, scientific journal

Abstract

Identifying research gaps from the extensive reading process is an inevitable choice for researchers in any field. This study aims to explore various approaches in identifying research gaps that have the potential to become elements of novelty. By using a grounded theory approach, the research reconstructs the cognitive experiences of a number of Indonesian expert authors in identifying research gaps. The results show that scientific journals as the primary source are accessed from the subscription data center; discuss and conduct knowledge sharing with expert groups; bibliography mapping by establishing a basic reference to avoid getting out of the focus of the research topic; state of the art and novelty elements will be seen from the extensive reading; using software to synthesize the literature review. It concludes that the research gap as the forerunner of the novelty element can only be done through an extensive reading process. Through extensive reading allows researchers or scientific writers to find many research gaps that can be explored.

References

Ali, M. J. (2022). Generating a research question: Keep the imagination roaming. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 37(2), 129-130.
Arianto, M. A., & Basthomi, Y. (2021). The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1743-1759. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.127
Azeez, F. T. (2022). Research gaps in management sciences: An x-ray of literature. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(1), 955-962.
Baako, I., Alhassan, H., & Gidisu, P. (2022). Understanding and spotting research gaps through a systematic literature review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(3), 549-554.
Bamford, J., Day, R. (2004). Extensive reading activities for teaching language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bermunez, N. (2021). Formulating well-written clinical practice questions and research questions. Nursing and Health Sciences Research Journal,4(1), 70-82.
Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the Literature Review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48-58.
Damayanti, A. (2019). Graphic organizer as strategy to teach extensive reading on non-fiction for EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 4(2), 251–262.
Delfi, S., & Yamat, H. (2017). Extensive reading in developing language competency for Indonesian EFL learners majoring in English. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 153–164.
Delfi, S., Diah, F. S., & Jismulatif, J. (2018). Exploring personal reading histories in developing reading interest of english study program learners of university of Riau. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 2(2), 205–218.
Demirci, H. C. (2019). Extensive reading in the English as a second language classroom–motivating and engaging male Emirati students in a higher education context. The University of Liverpool.
Fandino, W. (2019). Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 63, 611-616.
Farooq, R. (2018). A framework for identifying research gap in social sciences: Evidence from the past. The IUP Journal of Management Research, 16(4), 67-76
Hempel, S., Gore, K., Belsher, B. (2019). Identifying research gaps and prioritizing psychological health evidence synthesis needs. Med Care, 57(10), 259–264.
Heo, S. (2012). A study on the initial stage of extensive reading process through college students' journal writing. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(3), 77-92.
Jacquet, V., & van der Does, R. (2020). The consequences of deliberative mini publics: Systematic overview, conceptual gaps, and new directions. Representation, 57(1), 1–11.
Kupolati, S. (2022). Identifying research gaps for future research in infertility. Academia Letters, Article 4658. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL4658.
Linuwih, E. R. (2021). The effectiveness of extensive reading in improving EFL academic writing. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 167–177.
Lopes, F. O. A., Hurtado-Puerto, A. M., Moreno, H., Fregni, F., Falcão, D. P., Amorim, R. F. B. (2016). Creating a research idea: Steps and challenges. Geriatr Gerontol Aging, 10(3), 118 -125.
Milal, A. D., Jannah, R., Sa’adah, S. I., & Fitria, A. A. (2021). Reading preferences across genders of undergraduate EFL students in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 141-153.
Miles, D. A. (2017). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps. In Doctoral student workshop: finding research gaps-research methods and strategies, Dallas, Texas (pp. 1-15).
Moghaddasi, S., & Graves, H, A, B. (2017). Since Hadwiger’s conjection is still open: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 69-85.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1-7.
Nakanishi, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6–37
Nyanchoka, L., Tudur-Smith, C., Porcher, R., & Hren, D. (2020). Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: A qualitative study protocol. BMJ open, 9(8), e027926.
Nyanchoka, L., Tudur-Smith, C., Thu, V. N., Iversen, V., Tricco, A. C., & Porcher, R. (2019b). A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 109, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.005
Paul, J., Merchant, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rose, G. (2021). Writing an impactful review article: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Business Research, 133, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.05.005
Permatasari, I., Wijayanto, A., & Kristina, D. (2020). The strengths and weaknesses of extensive reading using wattpad; students’ perceptions. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 373-387.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing re-search: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Ramonda, K. (2017). The effects of implementing online extensive reading in the English classroom. Tokyo University of Science Research Bulletin, 49, 291-305.
Rayees, F. (2017). A framework for identifying research gap in social sciences: Evidence from the past. The IUP Journal of Management Research, 16(4), 67–76.
Robinson, K. A., Saldanha, I. J., & McKoy, N. A. (2011a). Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(12), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.009
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? SAGE Journals, 18(1), 23-44.
Seog, D. S. Y. (2016). A look at hagwon vs. extensive reading on L2 reading comprehension: Young Korean EFL learners. 인문과학연구, 48, 141-162.
Sun, X. (2020). An exploration of students’ and teachers’ perceptions of a two-year extensive reading program in a Chinese secondary school. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 20(1), 201-219.
Susanti, N. S., Amalia, S. S., Rachmawati, T., Simanjuntak, J. G. G. P., Trianita M.R.H. D., Manuel, A. (2022). Identifying a research gap in Indonesian governance. In The 3rd International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS), KnE Social Sciences (pp. 370–380). DOI 10.18502/kss.v7i9.10951
Tomaszewski, R. (2019). Substance-based bibliometrics: Identifying research gaps by counting and analyzing substances. ACS Omega, 4, 86−94
Utku, Ö., & Köroğlu, Z. Ç. (2017). Reading matters: A diary study analysis of extensive reading in L2. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 1(1). 24-42
Wafula, L. (2017). Extensive reading and its influence on language skills among learners of English language in secondary schools in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, MOI University).
William., Grabe (2012). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Wyllie, T. M. (2019). The importance of research gap. Project Research Methods.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
Ying-Chun, S., Chern, C. L., & Reynolds, B. L. (2018). Bringing extensive reading and reading strategies into the Taiwanese junior college classroom. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(1), 130-142.
Published
2022-12-01
How to Cite
Fadhly, F. (2022). Extensive Reading as a Gateway to Create Research Gap: Valuable Lessons from Indonesian Expert Authors. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v7i2.537