The Implementation of British Parliamentary Debating in Mulawarman Debate Society (MDS)

Lely Agustina, Bahrani Bahrani

Abstract


In English debate, the students will be exposed to the real problems facing a society or a nation.  The students are required to be able to give a strong and reasonable statement and solution so that they can practice English and convince the public that their idea will be expressed freely. This study found that there were some differences related to the implementation of British Parliamentary debating system, such us the differences of the amount of debater and adjudicator and length of speech. Those differences actually did not give bad effect significantly during the observation because of during observations, each member acted his or her role as well as the regulation of British Parliamentary debating system. It can be said that they had fulfilled their role fulfillment as debater, time keeper or the speaker and as adjudicator in every single debating practice. Beside the differences mentioned above, everything related to the implementation of British Parliamentary debating system in Mulawarman Debating Society were the same as the standard regulation of the British Parliamentary Debating System. For instance, there was case building for fifteen minutes before debating, the debater delivered POI, both accepted and declined it, and in the debate practice of MDS, the adjudication was also done by the adjudicator through giving verbal adjudication and ranking the team. The motion was also given by the adjudicator in the debate practice of MDS.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1993). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta.

Bailey, Kenneth. (1982). Methods of Social Research. New York : Free Prees.

Bogdan, R. C., Biklen K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education; An Introduction to Theory and Methods, Boston London: Allyn and Bacon.

Bellon, Joe. (2000). A Research-based Justification for Debate across the Curriculum, Atlanta, Georgio State University.

Carter, Ronald and Mc Carthy. (1997). Exploring Spoken English, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dale, Paulette and James C Wolf. (2000). Speech Communication Made Simple, NY: Miami-Dade Community College, 2nd Ed.

Fauzan, Umar. (2008). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. Samarinda: Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam

Fauzan, Umar. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Students through Debate and Peer Assessment, EFL JOURNAL, Vol. 1(1), 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8

Fulcher, Glenn. (2003). Testing Second Language Speaking, Britain: Pearson Education Limited

Flynn, Colm. (2014). Debating Tutorial Handsout. World Debating Website. Archived from: https://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/bphandbook.pdf, 1 March 2014

Harris, David P. (1969). Testing English as a Second Language, Georgetown University

Harmer, Jeremy. (2002). The Practice of English Language Teaching, Pearson Education limited England

Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English, NY : Oxford University Press

Husnawadi, H. & Syamsudarni, S. (2016). The Role of English Debating Tournament in the Face of the ASEAN Economy Community (AEC). Dinamika Ilmu. Vol. 16 No 1, 2016

Inoue, N. and Nakano, M. (2004). The Benefits and Costs of Participating in Competitive Debate Activities: Differences Between Japanese and American College Students. Wake Forest University/International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Venice Argumentation Conference, June 27–30

Jerome, L. and Algarra, B. (2006). English-Speaking Union London Debate Challenge: 2005–06 Final Evaluation Report. Cambridge and Chelmsford: Anglia Ruskin University

Latief, M. A. (2012). Tanya Jawab Metode Penelitian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Littlewood, William. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Pedoman National University Debating Championship (NUDC). Jakarta

Moleong, Lexy J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, (Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosda Karya

O’ Malley, J. Michael and Pierce, Lorraine Valdez. (1996). Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners, Addison-Wesley Company Inc

Richard and Rodgers. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press

Rohmatika, Arina & Ro’is, Syamsuddin. (2014). Penggunaan AREL pada Penyampaian Argumen di Klub Debat Bahasa Inggris STKIP PGRI Ponorogo. Dinamika Ilmu, Vol 14 No 2, 2014.

Rubiati, Richa. (2010). Improving Students’ Speaking Skill through Debate Technique, Semarang : IAIN Walisongo Semarang

Rydian, Morgan. (2014). British Parliamentary Debating. Archived from: https://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/Morgan_BP_Text.pdf, March 1, 2014

Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susan Stainback, William Stainback. (1988). Understanding and Conducting Qualitative Research, Dubuque Iowa: Kendall/ Hunt Publishing Company.

http://parliamentarydebate.blogspot.com/BritishParliamentaryDebate




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics); Email: indonesianefl@gmail.com; Web: www.indonesian-efl-journal.org

Creative Commons License
IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics) by http://indonesian-efl-journal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and Abstracted BY:

 

Hasil gambar untuk gambar moraref