Syntactic Analysis of Makassar Question Words: An X-Bar Theory Approach

  • Aisyah Tiara Rahmah Universitas Diponegoro
  • Agus Subiyanto Universitas Diponegoro
Keywords: Makassar Language, Question Words, Syntactic Analysis, X-Bar

Abstract

This article endeavors to scrutinize the creation and functionalities of interrogative constructions, with a specific emphasis on the Makassar Language. The research design employed in this study involved the use of primary sources and followed a descriptive approach. Data collection was carried out through conversations with Makassar participants. To analyze the syntactic data, the study adopted X-Bar Theory as its theoretical foundation, which was then depicted in the form of syntax trees. The findings of this study indicated that the Makassar Language serves two grammatical functions, namely as a specifier and a complement. The highest level of projection in this structure was the Complementizer Phrase/CP. The distinction between these functions lay in the placement of question words. When a question word was positioned at the beginning of a sentence, it functioned as a specifier and followed the interrogative structure rule of QW + Subject + Predicate + Adv (optional). On the other hand, question words that required an answer other than the subject or were positioned at the end of a sentence were referred to as complementary functions. In this function, the researcher identified the pattern where the structure was written as Subject + Predicate + QW. X-Bar theory also helps in teaching syntax which needs a lot practice including creating tree diagrams of sentences to parse each constituent that requires a platform or program that can lead the students to diagramming

References

Adiantika, H. N. (2020). Contrastive Analysis between Indonesian and English Declarative Sentences. ELT in Focus, 3(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.35706/eltinfc.v3i1.3695
Al-Enezi, A. S. (2018). The Constraints Governing Multiple Wh-Questions in Kuwaiti Arabic: A Syntactic Study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.8
Ali, Z., Azam, M., Asadullah, & Zafarullah. (2021). A morphological analysis of transitive and intransitive verbs in Lasi. Harf-o-Sukhan, 5(3), 346–356. https://www.harf-o-sukhan.com/index.php/Harf-o-sukhan/article/view/449
Azam, M., Ali, Z., & Shahida. (2022). Subject-Verb Agreement in Lasi and English: A Morphosyntactic Analysis. Global Language Review, VII(II), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(vii-ii).04
Bello, I. M. (2021). A study of grammatical case forms and their directionality in fulfulde: The transformational generative approach. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12(2), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-2-514-525
Carnie, A. (2006). Syntax A Generative Introduction 2nd Edition. Backwell Publishing.
Celle, A. (2023). Surprise questions in English and French. Open Linguistics, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0261
Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory (The view from Building) (Hale and K). MIT Press.
Cook, V. J. (1996). Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An introduction (Second). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Corbeanu, R. C., & Geană, I. (2024). Wh-Interrogative Clauses in Istro-Romanian. Languages, 9(64), 1–10.
Cox, R. (2020). Bromberger on the syntax of why-interrogatives. Lingua, 247.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
Divany, A., Sihotang, Z. S., Tambunan, R. L., Zahara, K., Ismahani, S., Fadhillah, Y., Fauziah, H. A., & Hafiz, M. (2024). Sentence Analysis in Syntax. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 2032–2037.
Ermolaeva, M. (2023). Evaluating syntactic proposals using minimalist grammars and minimum description length. Journal of Language Modelling, 11(1), 67–119. https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v11i1.334
Fitriyani, D. Z., & Mulyadi. (2017). Interrogative Sentence in Minangkabau Language: X-Bar Theory. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 3(1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.3.1.229.188-200
Fong, S., & Ginsburg, J. (2023). On the computational modeling of English relative clauses. Open Linguistics, 9(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0246
Gapur, A., & Pujiono, M. (2018). Konstruksi Interogatif Polar Dalam Bahasa Jepang. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v7i1.477
Granath, S. (2023). The Syntax and Semantics of the Double-faced Prepositions besides and beyond. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 22(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.819
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Hassanein, H. (2021). Oppositions in Arabic Proverbs: A Lexicosyntactic Perspective. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-01
Imamah, F. Z., & Subiyanto, A. (2021). The Translation Text of Drama “Macbeth”: Grammatical Transformation of Adjunct in Noun Phrase. Jurnal Ilmiah Lingua Idea, 12(2), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2021.12.2.2762
Isac, D. (2024). Daco-Romanian Definite DPs at the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Languages, 9(67), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030067
Jin, L., Schwartz, L., Doshi-Velez, F., Miller, T., & Schuler, W. (2021). Depth-bounded statistical pcfg induction as a model of human grammar acquisition. Computational Linguistics, 47(1), 181–216. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00399
Kaneko, M. (2024). Two past forms inducing conjectural or non-intrusive questions. Open Linguistics, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0274
Kato, Y. (2023). Puzzles in exploratory practice: The role of why questions. Language Teaching Research, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231220447
Mayasari, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Question Words in the Interrogative Construction in Javanese: in X-Bar Theory. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 4(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i1.2217
Morley, D. G. (2000). Syntax in Functional Grammar (An Introduction to Lexicon grammar in Systemic Linguistic). Paston Pre Press Ltd.
Mukramah, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Konstruksi Interogatif dalam Bahasa Aceh: Teori X-Bar. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i1.2114
Munaro, N., & Poletto, C. (2023). Towards a Typology of wh-Doubling in Northern Italian Dialects. Languages, 8(24), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010024
Muthalib, K. A., Rahmah, S., & Aziz, Z. A. (2022). Acehnese Lexical and Grammatical Collocations of the North Aceh Dialect. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 832–850. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.22680
Nurmala, D., & Mulyadi. (2022). Interrogative Construction in Javanese: X-Bar Theory Analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 5(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v5i21.5389
Pasaribu, G. R., & Mulyadi. (2023). Malay Interrogative Sentences: X-Bar Analysis. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 9(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.9.1.6191.43-53
Paul, I., & Potsdam, E. (2024). Malagasy framing demonstratives and the syntax of doubling. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 9(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9794
Rafat, M. (2022). Inner Dynamics of Syntax in Mohsin Hamid’s “Of Windows and Doors” and “A Beheading.” Literature and Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 27–41.
Sa’adiyah, E. N., & Reztia, D. (2019). A Syntactical Analysis of Simple Sentences in Kembhang Babur. Premise: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v8i2.2112
Sneddon, J. N. (1996). Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge.
Trinh, T., & Bassi, I. (2023). Excursive questions. Open Linguistics, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0232
Udoeyo, U. I., & Enang, V. S. (2018). Wh-Question Formation in Ékᴉd. ERUDITE (Journal of Linguistics and Languages), 3(1), 57–69.
Uktolseja, L. J., Sujaja, H., & Matinahoru, M. F. (2019). A Contrastive Analysis Between English and Indonesian Kinds of Sentences. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2019.8.1.54-61
Valentino, Y. B. (2023). English for Business and Professional Communication: A Syntactic Ambiguity Analysis of a Study Program’s Name. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 7(1), 53–71.
Van Eecke, P., Nevens, J., & Beuls, K. (2022). Neural heuristics for scaling constructional language processing. Journal of Language Modelling, 10(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v10i2.318
Van Valin, R. J. (2004). An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, K., & Faghiri, P. (2023). Introduction to Lexical constraints in grammar: Minority verb classes and restricted alternations. Open Linguistics, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0271
Wittaningsih, A. (2018). English Passive Voice: An X-Bar Theory Analysis. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 4(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v4i2.2305
Published
2024-05-13
How to Cite
Rahmah, A., & Subiyanto, A. (2024). Syntactic Analysis of Makassar Question Words: An X-Bar Theory Approach. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 9(1), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v9i1.774